YES 0.62 H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:



HASKELL
  ↳ CR

mainModule Main
  ((scanl1 :: (a  ->  a  ->  a ->  [a ->  [a]) :: (a  ->  a  ->  a ->  [a ->  [a])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Case Reductions:
The following Case expression
case xs of
 [] → []
 x : xs → scanl f (f q xxs

is transformed to
scanl0 f q [] = []
scanl0 f q (x : xs) = scanl f (f q xxs



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ CR
HASKELL
      ↳ BR

mainModule Main
  ((scanl1 :: (a  ->  a  ->  a ->  [a ->  [a]) :: (a  ->  a  ->  a ->  [a ->  [a])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.

↳ HASKELL
  ↳ CR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
HASKELL
          ↳ COR

mainModule Main
  ((scanl1 :: (a  ->  a  ->  a ->  [a ->  [a]) :: (a  ->  a  ->  a ->  [a ->  [a])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
undefined 
 | False
 = undefined

is transformed to
undefined  = undefined1

undefined0 True = undefined

undefined1  = undefined0 False



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ CR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
HASKELL
              ↳ Narrow

mainModule Main
  (scanl1 :: (a  ->  a  ->  a ->  [a ->  [a])

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ CR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ BR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ COR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ Narrow
QDP
                  ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_scanl(vy3, :(vy410, vy411), ba) → new_scanl(vy3, vy411, ba)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: